Sunday, May 14, 2017

Mini Term Project

Introduction
            The area I chose to study is Eau Claire County, Wisconsin. I chose this area of study because I have spent many hours in the County Parks and wanted to create a project that involved an area that I was quite familiar with. The purpose of my project was to create a map that displayed areas in the county that are the most prone to having fires. The two main areas that I wanted to study where the railroads and the County Parks. My intended audience is for people who plan to visit the local county forests and state parks. The reason that this research is relevant is that county parks receive large numbers of visitors every year and many of these visitors who come to these destinations create campfires. The park visitors should be aware of the potential risks of fire in the areas in which they plan to camp. Another audience that this research would be pertinent to would be fire response groups located in Eau Claire County as the final map displays regions within the county that are the most prone to experiencing fires. After importing the fire locations layer, it was evident that the railroad was an area of great importance as in the areas that surround the railroads have seen many fires over the years.

Data
            Data for this project was acquired through the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire department server. I used data from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to display the locations of previous fires as well as the locations of County Parks. I also used data from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to show the locations of railroads, lakes, rivers and streams in Eau Claire County. Concerns about the data include questions on the spatial accuracy of the fire locations as well as the size and intensity of the fires themselves. The fire locations did have the necessary dates so I felt confident in the legitimacy of the temporal accuracy of the data.

Methods
            To begin my project, I imported a layer that contained the counties of the United States and selected Eau Claire County and then created a new a layer for the country. I then imported the Rivers, Lakes, Fire Locations, Railroad, and County Parks layers. Once all the layers were into ArcMap and clipped them all individually by Eau Claire County Shapefile creating new layers that only contained data within Eau Claire County. Once I had all of the necessary layers overlaid over the Eau Claire County, I merged the Rivers and Lakes layer to create a single layer that contained all the water present in the county. I then applied a 500 meter buffer to this layer because these areas are less susceptible to fire. Once the buffer was created, I used the dissolve tool to smooth the buffer feature and get rid of all the excess polygons contained in the buffer. I then erased the river and lake buffer from the Parks layer leaving me with areas in the parks that were at least 500 meters from water bodies. I then intersected the Fire Locations layer with the Parks layer. With this layer now containing the locations of fires, I then classified the parks by the number of fires in each park. I then placed a 200 meter buffer around the Railroad layer. After placing the buffer around the Railroad layer, I then and spatial joined the Fire Locations layer by all the fires that were within the 200 meter buffer that I placed around the Railroad Layer. After placing the Fire Locations in the correct places, I deleted the excess Fire Locations from the Map. What was left was all the Fire Locations contained in the 200 meter Railroad buffer and inside the County Parks Layer. 


Results
            The map below shows the County Parks that have had a 200 River and Lake buffer erased from their shapefile. The County Parks are also classified by the number of fires that have occurred in the park along with the locations of the fires. The map also displays the locations of fires within 200 meters of the major railroad tracks. Based on the locations of the fires across the county, it was very evident that the County Parks and railroads were a large contributor prevalence of fires in Eau Claire County. Lake Eau Claire State Park has the highest number of fires contained within the borders of the park 

Evaluation
            The Mini Term project was a great experience that truly helped grow my GIS skills. Through the use of different geoprocessing function such as Buffering, Merging, Intersecting and spatial joins, GIS has the ability to solve and visualize problems in the “real-world” through the means of modeling. This project solidified the belief that GIS are a very valuable tool solving many complex problems in the world today across a vast number of different disciplines and fields. 

Working through my own project and having to problem solve, helped solidify the skills that I learned throughout the semester in Geography 335. It helped me develope a spacial question to a hypothetical problem and work through the challenges of using multiple different geoprocessing tools and functions solving these problems proved to be invaluable to the implementation of concepts covered throughout the course. As well as providing valuable experience working with different databases. If I were to do this project over again, I would choose a larger area of study so that a greater number of spatial variables could be applied and create a more complex and well-rounded project.

Sources
Data for this project was acquired through the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire department of Geography and Anthropology server as well as mgisdata that came with the Price book located in the GIS class’s lab folder (geogsql.uwec.edu)


Image from: http://borealforestfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ForestFires.jpg

Sunday, May 7, 2017

Lab 5: Vector Processing

Background and Goal
The goal of this lab was to solve geospatial questions using a variety of different geoprocessing tools and Python Scripting.


Methods
To begin the lab I was given the task of finding suitable bear habitat in Marquette County, Michigan. To begin I brought in the land use, bear locations, and streams. The bear locations did not display the locations of the bears, to do display their location on the map I assigned the layer's table X and Y values that gave the location of the bears. After the location of the bears had been established, I intersected the bear locations layer and the land use layers. Once the two were intersected I summarized the table by land use type and the number of bears located within each. Once I found the top three land use areas for the number of bears found within, I selected those top three land use types and created a new layer. Another requirement for bear habitat was to be located within 500 meters of a stream, so I created a 500 meter buffer around the streams layer and intersected it with the newly created land use layer that contained only the top 3 bear habitat areas, giving me a new layer. Another requirement for the bear habitat was that it needed to be with DNR controlled areas. I brought in the DNR lands layer and intersected with the layer I had just created giving a new layer that contained lands that were within 500 meters of a stream, were the top 3 land use areas for the location of bears, and the qualifying DNR lands. The last requirement for the bear habitat was that it needed to be 5 kilometers from urban areas. To do this, I opened the attribute table of the original land use layer and selected urban areas and created a new urban land use layer. I then buffered this layer and erased it from the layer that contained the previous parameters giving me a final layer that showed the DNR managed lands that were in the top 3 bear habitats, at least 5 kilometers from urban development and located within 500 meters of streams. I then used that layer to create the map below.
Data Flow Model for the map created below

Bear Habitat Map created from the steps discussed above


The next section of the lab involved writing python script to complete geoprocessing functions. The first task was to find lakes that would be suitable for the establishment of lakeside resorts. I wrote scripts that would place a 10 mile buffer around the major cities in Wisconsin. I than ran another script that gave me all of the lakes found within this 10 mile buffer.
Python Script used to create a 10 mile buffer around major cities in Wisconsin
Map showing lakes that qualify as potential locations for lakeside resorts


After creating a map that displayed air pollution hazard zones along interstates. I wrote script that created a buffer around the interstates at 1,2,3,4,5,6 mile intervals. Once the buffer was created I categorized the buffer zones from high to low risk by proximity to the interstate.
 Python Script used to create the buffer around the Interstates
Air Pollution Hazard Map for the State of Wisconsin

Sources
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Esri.
Price, Maribeth. 2016.  Mastering ArcGIS. 7th Edition data. McGraw Hill
Wilson, Cyril 2012, A comprehensive Lake features for Wisconsin, Unpublished data.